6) CWUCOM312 – Worth Chapter 4 – American University Case

Do you see any ways in wich the recommendations of Carver, Chait et al, and Herman and Heimovics might be relevant to The American University case study in Chapter 4? Discuss…

Advertisements

One thought on “6) CWUCOM312 – Worth Chapter 4 – American University Case

  1. Wendy Bynum says:

    Carver would have said that the board did not oversee the CEO and watch what he did as well as being able to use the university funds without the board having authorizing it. There would have been a policy made by the board that prevents such things from happening. Chait et al. would argue that the board and CEO did not work together on where this money should have gone, because obviously the board knew nothing about the CEO using the funds. It seems as though the board and CEO had a good relationship from what we are given, besides this issue about the misused funds. Herman and Hermovics would say that they needed to have worked and talked together about this matter (when the funds were used) which would have continued to give them a good relationship, so they needed to have listen to Carver or Chait et al. to have stayed on good terms.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s